Why Hardware Wallets, Slashing Protection & Governance Voting Matter in Cosmos Ecosystem

Okay, so check this out—if you’re deep into Cosmos, you’ve probably wrestled with the headache of securing your tokens, managing staking risks, and keeping up with governance decisions. Seriously, it’s a jungle out there. I mean, I’ve been around crypto wallets for years, and this stuff can trip you up faster than you can say “IBC transfer.”

Now, hardware wallets? They’re not just some fancy gadget for the paranoid. They’re your fortress. But it’s not just about plugging in a device and calling it a day. Integrating hardware wallets into Cosmos wallets, like the one you can find at https://keplrwallet.app, is where the magic really happens.

Whoa! Here’s the kicker: even if your wallet’s secure, you gotta worry about slashing. Yeah, that nasty penalty that burns your staked tokens if your validator acts up or goes offline. It’s like a tax you never wanted, but it’s very very important to keep it in check.

On one hand, slashing might seem like a validator’s problem. Though actually, if you’re delegating, it’s your problem too. I initially thought, “Hey, just pick a reliable validator and chill.” But no. Validators can have outages, get slashed, or even misbehave. And your stake suffers. So what’s the solution? Slashing protection tools that automatically guard your stake—some wallets and services integrate this seamlessly.

But wait, governance voting—now there’s a beast of another kind. Many users ignore it or find it intimidating. Yet, governance is how you actually steer the network’s future. You get to vote on upgrades, parameters, and even slashing rules. I’m biased, but skipping governance is like owning a stake in a company and never showing up to shareholder meetings. Dumb, right?

Close-up of a hardware wallet device with Cosmos tokens in background

Here’s what bugs me about some wallets: they *claim* to support hardware wallets but make the process clunky. You end up clicking through endless prompts, losing your patience, and sometimes just giving up. Keplr, on the other hand, nails it with a smooth interface that feels like it was designed by people who actually use Cosmos daily.

But it’s not just UX. The real deal is how these wallets communicate with the hardware devices and the network. I remember once—I tried to stake with a hardware wallet that didn’t have slashing protection baked in. Result? Validator went offline overnight, and boom—20% cut from my stake. Ouch. Something felt off about the whole setup.

Let me rephrase that—hardware wallets make you *feel* safe, but without slashing protection, you’re riding blind. That’s why the best Cosmos wallets integrate both. They manage your keys offline while keeping an eye on validator performance and automatically adjusting or alerting you if things go south.

Hardware Wallet Integration: Not Just Plug-and-Play

Using a Ledger or Trezor with Cosmos is great. But the devil’s in the details. The wallet must support Cosmos-specific derivation paths and signing algorithms. Otherwise, your hardware wallet is just a fancy paperweight. I’ve seen folks struggle with this—hours lost, no joke.

But here’s the cool part: modern wallets like Keplr offer native support for Ledger devices, making staking and IBC transfers a breeze. You connect your hardware wallet, confirm transactions physically, and the software handles the rest. It’s like having Fort Knox in your pocket.

Hmm… one caveat though: hardware wallets can’t protect you from slashing by themselves. That’s a network-level risk. So your wallet or staking service needs to provide slashing protection mechanisms.

Slashing Protection: Why It’s Your Silent Guardian

Imagine this: your validator node crashes or double-signs a block. The network slashes your stake to punish bad behavior. If you didn’t notice, you just lost a chunk of your investment. Awful, right?

Slashing protection tools work by monitoring validator status and automatically unbonding or redelegating your stake if the validator misbehaves or goes offline. Some even freeze your stake temporarily. This kind of automation is very very important, especially if you can’t stare at your dashboard 24/7.

On one hand, you could try manual monitoring. But seriously, who’s got the time? On the other, full automation requires trust in your wallet or a third-party service. The question is: do you trust your wallet provider? I’m not 100% sure about all services, but Keplr comes with solid community backing, which is reassuring.

Governance Voting: Your Voice, Your Power

Governance in Cosmos isn’t just for whales or devs. It’s for everyone. Voting affects inflation rates, validator sets, protocol upgrades—you name it. Yet, many users don’t participate, citing complexity or apathy. That part bugs me.

Okay, so check this out—wallets that link hardware wallet support with easy governance voting lower the barrier to entry. You can securely sign votes offline and send them with confidence. No more fumbling with private keys in hot wallets.

Something else I noticed: governance proposals often come with a ton of technical jargon. I get it, it’s complicated. But some wallets provide summaries or community discussions inline, making the process less intimidating. That’s a huge step forward.

Interestingly, delegators who don’t vote might have their stake counted as abstentions, potentially affecting outcomes. So even if you delegate, your direct vote matters.

By the way, if you’re looking for a wallet supporting all this—hardware integration, slashing protection, and governance voting—go give https://keplrwallet.app a spin. It really stands out.

So What’s the Takeaway?

Initially, I thought staking was just about picking a validator and holding. But then I realized it’s an ecosystem dance: you need secure key storage, active risk management, and a say in governance.

Hardware wallets are your fortress walls. Slashing protection is the moat. Governance voting is your voice in the castle. Ignore any one of these, and you might as well leave the front door wide open.

On that note, the Cosmos ecosystem is maturing fast. Wallets that integrate these features naturally—without making you feel like you need a PhD in blockchain—are the ones worth trusting.

So yeah, if you’re serious about Cosmos staking and IBC transfers, don’t settle for less. I’m not saying it’s perfect everywhere yet—no system is. But the progress is clear, and wallets like https://keplrwallet.app show the way forward.

1 Unstoppable Artificial Intelligence AI Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist in 2024 The Motley Fool

What the Finance Industry Tells Us About the Future of AI

ai in finance

Already, 67% of respondents in our State of AI survey said they are currently using machine learning, and almost 97% plan to use it in the near future. Among executives whose companies have adopted AI, ai in finance many envision it transforming not only businesses, but also entire industries in the next five years. In fact, 78 per cent of young people say they will not use a bank if an alternative is available.

Finance Minister Sitharaman Unpacks Debate on AI and Job – Techiexpert.com – TechiExpert.com

Finance Minister Sitharaman Unpacks Debate on AI and Job – Techiexpert.com.

Posted: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 06:44:38 GMT [source]

The Review will include considering digital developments and their impacts on the provision of financial services to consumers. Synthetic datasets can also allow financial firms to secure non-disclosive computation to protect consumer privacy, another of the important challenges of data use in AI, by creating anonymous datasets that comply with privacy requirements. Traditional data anonymisation approaches do not provide rigorous privacy guarantees, as ML models have the power to make inferences in big datasets. The use of big data by AI-powered models could expand the universe of data that is considered sensitive, as such models can become highly proficient in identifying users individually (US Treasury, 2018[32]). Facial recognition technology or data around the customer profile can be used by the model to identify users or infer other characteristics, such as gender, when joined up with other information. The proposal also provides for solutions addressing self-preferencing, parity and ranking requirements to ensure no favourable treatment to the services offered by the Gatekeeper itself against those of third parties.

Companies Using AI in Cybersecurity and Fraud Detection for Banking

The use of AI mechanisms can unlock insights from data to inform investment strategies, while it can also potentially enhance financial inclusion by allowing for the analysis of creditworthiness of clients with limited credit history (e.g. thin file SMEs). DataRobot provides machine learning software for data scientists, business analysts, software engineers, executives and IT professionals. DataRobot helps financial institutions and businesses quickly build accurate predictive models that inform decision making around issues like fraudulent credit card transactions, digital wealth management, direct marketing, blockchain, lending and more. Alternative lending firms use DataRobot’s software to make more accurate underwriting decisions by predicting which customers have a higher likelihood of default. The widespread adoption of AI and ML by the financial industry may give rise to some employment challenges and needs to upgrade skills, both for market participants and for policy makers alike.

In Canada, for instance, firms are required to have built-in ‘override’ functionalities that automatically disengage the operation of the system or allows the firm to do so remotely, should need be (IIROC, 2012[14]). Automating middle-office tasks with AI has the potential to save North American banks $70 billion by 2025. Further, the aggregate potential cost savings for banks from AI applications is estimated at $447 billion by 2023, with the front and middle office accounting for $416 billion of that total.

Fintech: Future of AI in Financial Services

The platform utilizes natural language processing to analyze keyword searches within filings, transcripts, research and news to discover changes and trends in financial markets. The second necessary shift is to embed customer journeys seamlessly in partner ecosystems and platforms, so that banks engage customers at the point of end use and in the process take advantage of partners’ data and channel platform to increase higher engagement and usage. ICICI Bank in India embedded basic banking services on WhatsApp (a popular messaging platform in India) and scaled up to one million users within three months of launch.9“ICICI Bank crosses 1 million users on WhatsApp platform,” Live Mint, July 7, 2020, livemint.com. In a world where consumers and businesses rely increasingly on digital ecosystems, banks should decide on the posture they would like to adopt across multiple ecosystems—that is, to build, orchestrate, or partner—and adapt the capabilities of their engagement layer accordingly. Documentation of the logic behind the algorithm, to the extent feasible, is being used by some regulators as a way to ensure that the outcomes produced by the model are explainable, traceable and repeatable (FSRA, 2019[46]). The Federal Reserve’s guidance for model risk management includes also documentation of model development and validation that is sufficiently detailed to allow parties unfamiliar with a model to understand how the model operates, its limitations and key assumptions (Federal Reserve, 2011[48]).

Regulatory sandboxes specifically targeting AI applications could be a way to understand some of these potential incompatibilities, as was the case in Colombia. Spoofing is an illegal market manipulation practice that involves placing bids to buy or offers to sell securities or commodities with the intent of cancelling the bids or offers prior to the deal’s execution. It is designed to create a false sense of investor demand in the market, thereby manipulating the behaviour and actions of other market participants and allowing the spoofer to profit from these changes by reacting to the fluctuations. Such tools can also be used in high frequency trading to the extent that investors use them to place trades ahead of competition. And since Finance draws upon enormous amounts of data, it’s a natural fit to take advantage of generative AI.

Great Companies Need Great People. That’s Where We Come In.

Full-body deep fakes manipulate a person’s entire form, altering actions creating realistic videos. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Extracts from publications may be subject to additional disclaimers, which are set out in the complete version of the publication, available at the link provided. Natural Language Processing (NLP), a subset of AI, is the ability of a computer program to understand human language as it is spoken and written (referred to as natural language).

As outliers could move the market into states with significant systematic risk or even systemic risk, a certain level of human intervention in AI-based automated systems could be necessary in order to manage such risks and introduce adequate safeguards. Potential consequences of the use of AI in trading are also observed in the competition field (see Chapter 4). Traders may intentionally add to the general lack of transparency and explainability in proprietary ML models so as to retain their competitive edge. In addition, the use of algorithms in trading can also make collusive outcomes easier to sustain and more likely to be observed in digital markets (OECD, 2017[16]).

What leading AI finance organizations do differently

Although a convergence of AI and DLTs in blockchain-based finance is promoted by the industry as a way to yield better results in such systems, this is not observed in practice at this stage. Increased automation amplifies efficiencies claimed by DLT-based systems, however, the actual level of AI implementation in DLT-based projects does not appear to be sufficiently large at this stage to justify claims of convergence between the two technologies. Instead, what is currently observed is the use of specific AI applications in blockchain-based systems (e.g. for the curation of data to the blockchain) or the use of DLT systems for the purposes of AI models (e.g. for data storage and sharing). AI techniques could further strengthen the ability of BigTech to provide novel and customised services, reinforcing their competitive advantage over traditional financial services firms and potentially allowing BigTech to dominate in certain parts of the market. The data advantage of BigTech could in theory allow them to build monopolistic positions, both in relation to client acquisition (for example through effective price discrimination) and through the introduction of high barriers to entry for smaller players. Similar considerations apply to trading desks of central banks, which aim to provide temporary market liquidity in times of market stress or to provide insurance against temporary deviations from an explicit target.

ai in finance

She’s also on guard for bias all the time and ingests large amounts of operational, financial, and third-party data with ease. AI is very useful in corporate finance since it can forecast and analyze loan risks more accurately. AI technology such as machine learning can enhance loan screening and minimize financial risk for businesses trying to raise their valuation. Using analysis from a wide range of perspectives, this year’s edition examines the implications arising from the growing importance of AI-powered applications in finance, responsible business conduct, competition, foreign direct investment and regulatory oversight and supervision.

solve real challenges in financial services

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in finance encompasses everything from chatbot assistants to fraud detection and task automation. Most banks (80%) are highly aware of the potential benefits presented by AI, according to Insider Intelligence’s AI in Banking report. Despite its remarkable potential to help finance organizations navigate complex, high-volume data, generative AI’s limitations introduce real challenges that CFOs must raise when considering use of generative AI in finance and across the organization. Successful CFOs partner with senior technology leadership (e.g., the CIO, chief data officer, chief information security officer) to distinguish hype from reality, and then share the results of those conversations with other executive leadership team members. Darktrace’s AI, machine learning platform analyzes network data and creates probability-based calculations, detecting suspicious activity before it can cause damage for some of the world’s largest financial firms. An f5 case study provides an overview of how one bank used its solutions to enhance security and resilience, while mitigating key cybersecurity threats.

ai in finance

It has been deploying this technology for anti-money laundering and, per an Insider Intelligence assessment, has quadrupled the output compared to the usual capabilities of the earlier systems. Financial institutions across all financial services are utilizing AI algorithms, keeping important economic benefits and demand from tech-savvy customers at the forefront of their minds. AI in finance should be seen as a technology that augments human capabilities instead of replacing them. At the current stage of maturity of AI solutions, and to ensure that vulnerabilities and risks arising from the use of AI-driven techniques are minimised, some level of human supervision of AI-techniques is still necessary.

Unlike automation software that can do simple, rote tasks, artificial intelligence performs tasks that historically could only be handled by humans. But despite AI’s capabilities, finance has unique responsibilities — such as validating the integrity of financial statements — that can’t be delegated to an algorithm. The complexity of delivering unbiased and valid financials demands that people remain engaged in the automation loop. AI-forward finance functions design AI-driven processes so that automated steps and decisions are observable and that people can interrupt an automated process and supplement actions with human judgment. AI and blockchain are both used across nearly all industries — but they work especially well together. AI’s ability to rapidly and comprehensively read and correlate data combined with blockchain’s digital recording capabilities allows for more transparency and enhanced security in finance.

ai in finance